First Transdermal Patch for Treating Depression

Did regulators fail over selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors?

Varenicline May Be More Effective Than Bupropion for Smoking Cessation

horizontal rule

First Transdermal Patch for Treating Depression

Source:
Food and Drug Administration

The Food and Drug Administration today approved Emsam (selegiline), the first skin (transdermal) patch for use in treating major depression. The once a day patch works by delivering selegiline, a monoamine oxidase inhibitor or MAOI, through the skin and into the bloodstream. At its lowest strength, Emsam can be used without the dietary restrictions that are needed for all oral MAO inhibitors that are approved for treating major depression.

"Emsam provides a significant advance because at least in its lowest dose patients can use the drug without the usual dietary restrictions associated with these types of drugs known as MAO inhibitors,“ said Dr. Steven Galson, Director for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

Major depressive disorder is a common psychiatric condition in the U.S. population. Symptoms of depression include general emotional dejection, withdrawal and restlessness that interfere with daily functioning, such as loss of interest in usual activities; significant change in weight and/or appetite; insomnia; increased fatigue; feelings of guilt or worthlessness; slowed thinking or impaired concentration; and a suicide attempt or suicidal ideation.

MAO inhibitors usually require specific dietary restrictions because when combined with certain foods they can cause a sudden, large increase in blood pressure, or “hypertensive crisis”. A hypertensive crisis can lead to a stroke and death. Symptoms of a hypertensive crisis include sudden onset of severe headache, nausea, stiff neck, a fast heartbeat or a change in the way your heart beats (palpitations), sweating, and confusion. Patients who have these symptoms should get medical care right away.

The lowest dose of the MAOI patch, which delivers 6 milligrams (mg) of the medication over a 24 hour period, can be used without such dietary restrictions.

The Emsam patch will be made available in three sizes that deliver 6, 9, or 12 mg of selegiline per 24 hours. The patch is a matrix containing three layers consisting of a backing, and adhesive drug layer, and a release liner that is placed against the skin.

Emsam has been shown safe and effective for treatment of major depressive disorder in two 6-8 week studies and also in a longer-term study of patients. The data for EMSAM 6mg/24hr support the recommendation that a modified diet is not required at this dose. Patients are advised to change the patch once a day. The more limited data available for EMSAM 9mg/24hr and 12mg/24hr do not rule out food effects so that patients receiving these higher doses should follow dietary restrictions that advise them to avoid certain foods or beverages. This includes foods and beverages such as aged cheese and wine.

The only common side effect of Emsam detected in placebo-controlled trials was a mild skin reaction where the patch is placed. There may be mild redness at the site when a patch is removed. If the redness does not go away within several hours after removing the patch or if irritation or itching continues, patients are advised to contact their doctor.

Another side effect that was seen less commonly was light-headedness related to a drop in blood pressure.

The manufacturer and distributor of this new product have planned an educational campaign for patients and prescribers to ensure that advice on dietary modifications for the higher patch strengths is adhered to. They plan to conduct both patient and health care provider surveys to assess the effectiveness of the educational campaign. The manufacturer and distributor will also closely track reports of adverse events, and follow-up on those that might represent hypertensive crises, to further ensure the safe use of this product.

Although the effects of heat on the patch are not known, the drug labeling advises health care professionals and patients about the possible effects of direct heat applied to the Emsam patch. Direct heat may result in an increased amount of the drug absorbed from the patch. Patients should avoid exposing the patch to heating pads, electric blankets, heat lamps, saunas, hot tubs, or prolonged sunlight.

Like all approved antidepressants, this product carries a warning of increased suicidality in children and adolescents.

EMSAM was developed by Somerset Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In December 2004, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Somerset entered into an agreement that provides Bristol-Myers Squibb with distribution rights to market EMSAM after approval in the United States. Selegiline was initially approved in capsule form for use in Parkinson's Disease.

Link: http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2006/NEW01326.html

horizontal rule

Did regulators fail over selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors?

Source:
BMJ 2006;333: 92-95

This article notes that the controversy over the safety of antidepressants has shaken public confidence and asks, “Were mistakes made and could they have been avoided?” The article is set out under the following headings:

• Regulatory problem
• Manipulation of data
• Interpretation of evidence
• Risk periods
• Confounding effect?
• Conclusions

The main summary points (taken directly from the article) are provided below:

• The case of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors suggests that current regulatory practice overstates the benefits and underestimates the risks of drugs
• Manufacturers' inappropriate inclusion of suicidal acts in the placebo group biased estimates of suicide risk
• Regulators' rigid interpretation of confidence intervals may have delayed warnings of dangers of suicidal acts
• When individual drug trials are small regulators are in a unique position to analyse class effects but have rarely done so.


Link: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/333/7558/92

horizontal rule

Varenicline May Be More Effective Than Bupropion for Smoking Cessation 

Source: JAMA. 2006;296:47-71, 94-95

Varenicline is more effective than bupropion or placebo for smoking cessation, according to the results of 3 randomized studies reported in the July 5 issue of JAMA.

"The alpha-4-beta-2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are linked to the reinforcing effects of nicotine and maintaining smoking behavior," write David Gonzales, PhD, from Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, and colleagues from the Varenicline Phase 3 Study Group. "Varenicline, a novel alpha-4-beta-2 nAChR partial agonist, may be beneficial for smoking cessation."

The first study was a double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial conducted at 19 US centers from June 19, 2003, to April 22, 2005. The investigators used advertising to recruit 1025 generally healthy smokers of at least 10 cigarettes per day, aged 18 to 75 years, with fewer than 3 months of smoking abstinence in the past year. These participants were randomized to receive brief counseling and varenicline titrated to 1 mg twice per day (n = 352), sustained-release bupropion (bupropion SR) titrated to 150 mg twice per day (n = 329), or placebo (n = 344) orally for 12 weeks, with 40 weeks of nondrug follow-up.

The main outcome measure was the 4-week rate of continuous abstinence from smoking for weeks 9 through 12, confirmed by exhaled carbon monoxide. Secondary outcomes included the rates of continuous abstinence for weeks 9 through 24 and weeks 9 through 52.

For weeks 9 through 12, the 4-week continuous abstinence rates were 44.0% for varenicline, 17.7% for placebo, and 29.5% for bupropion SR. Odds ratios [ORs] were 3.85 for varenicline vs placebo (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.70 - 5.50; P < .001); 1.93 for varenicline vs bupropion SR (95% CI, 1.40 - 2.68; P <.001); and 2.00 for bupropion SR vs placebo (95% CI, 1.38 - 2.89; P < .001).

For weeks 9 through 52, the continuous abstinence rates were 21.9% for varenicline vs 8.4% for placebo (OR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.95 - 4.91; P < .001) and vs 16.1% for bupropion SR (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.99 - 2.17; P = .057).

There were no sex differences in efficacy for varenicline. This drug reduced craving and withdrawal symptoms, and smoking satisfaction for those who smoked while receiving it. Varenicline was safe and generally well-tolerated, and study drug discontinuation rates were similar to those seen with placebo. The most common adverse events were nausea in 98 participants (28.1%) receiving varenicline and insomnia in 72 (21.9%) receiving bupropion SR.

"Varenicline was significantly more efficacious than placebo for smoking cessation at all time points and significantly more efficacious than bupropion SR at the end of 12 weeks of drug treatment and at 24 weeks," the authors write. "The hypothesis that a partial nAChR agonist would effectively reduce cravings and smoking satisfaction or reinforcement was supported and suggests a new direction for development of smoking cessation therapies."

Study limitations include inability to address the effects of varenicline on smokers with a history of bupropion use; and inclusion of generally healthy smokers, who may not be representative of smokers most likely to seek treatment.

Link to Abstract: http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/296/1/47

horizontal rule

Boletín de Actualización en Neuropsicofarmacología (BAN)
Editor: Luis I. Mariani
Para suscribirse enviar un e-mail en blanco a: neuropsicofarmacologia-subscribe@gruposyahoo.com.ar
Número de Suscriptos:
928 

Mayor información sobre Psicofármacos disponible en: http:www.eutimia.com/psicofarmacos

Si desea invitar a un/a colega a suscribirse al Boletín de Actualización en Neuropsicofarmacología (BAN), ingrese la dirección de e-mail del mismo/a y haga clic en Enviar: